With the start of the New Year, I thought I’d redo the old blog. The original idea was for me to keep a record of every band I saw over the past year, which, whilst a good idea in theory, proved to be a lot harder in practice. Writing something mildly entertaining about every single gig gets a little tiresome, especially when most bands inspire little more than a “meh”. So I’m going to stop talking about every band and every gig; from now on it’s only the good ones. Or the really bad ones, which leads me to my brand new feature, hilariously titled “Congratulations! Your Band Sucks!”
This month’s lucky band is a four piece band from Sheffield called Flat Pack Heroes.
Picture the scene: you’re planning to go and see Liars, you think you’ve timed your arrival in such a way that you won’t have to endure the local support band. You arrive at the venue. You hear a band playing. Worried that you’ve missed the start of the band you plan to see, you hurry through to the stage where instead of seeing the familiar sight of Liars, you’re greeted by the unfamiliar sight of four boys, two of whom are topless, playing something that is best described as bad punk; a band who you cannot take your eyes off, who demand your attention, not because of how good they are but simply by virtue of the fact that they seem to be doing so many things wrong. That band ladies and gentlemen is Flat Pack Heroes.
The obvious place to start is the music – Flat Pack Heroes are best described as a punk band, in that the music they play bears the most resemblance to the Sex Pistols. However, to say they’re a punk band is to give them too much credit. The attitudes and ideas that are implied by the phrase punk seem to be lost on them. In the same way that a gig promoter will excuse poor turnouts, poor payment for bands, poor equipment and poor venues with the excuse that it’s “rock and roll,” Flat Pack Heroes excuse their poor musical output as “punk.” They represent everything bad about punk, right down to the singer’s Johnny Rotten impersonations. It slowly dawned on me that this one was one of the worst bands I’d ever seen, joining the ranks of The Charlie Brown Story, Bickle’s Cab and The Stereophonics. Not only that, it wasn’t the first time I’d seen them.
About two years ago, my old band did a gig in Cheltenham. One of the local support bands was called The Labels. They had their own banner made from an old Union Jack with The Labels written across it. They also did a cover of “I Bet You Look Good On The Dance Floor”. I think they must have taken a lot of cues from The Arctic Monkeys because they’ve since re-located to Sheffield and renamed themselves Flat Pack Heroes (that bit was probably obvious). They’ve also made an attempt at social realism. I’ve never known a band to miss understand the point of social realism in lyrics – you write a song that the general public can relate to, most likely about how their life is depressing and unfulfilling but your life is great because you get to live your dream of playing in a band until you get dropped a year later (hello Little Man Tate). Even that guy from The Enemy can manage it. You listen to a Pulp record and go from there (or in the case of The Enemy, you steal wholeheartedly from The Jam). Not the Flat Pack Heroes. The best they manage is the charming couplet “She’s a slag/But I bet you’ve had her”. Just read that again to take in how bad it is. And that was the hook in the song. They also managed to name check Topshop, Facebook and Myspace all in one song. Once again they’ve missed the entire point.
The final nail in the coffin of their set came just before they played their last song. They mentioned they had a free demo cd available. This is a good idea. They then proceeded to throw copies of said demo into the crowd. The crowd consisted of about 30 people; only about 10 of these were stood anywhere near the front or paying any sort of attention to the band. You could hear the clatter of unwanted cds hitting the floor. I think one hit a girl on the head. I feel privileged to have witnessed such a desperate plea for recognition. In fact, I feel privileged to have seen such a terrible band.
Did I mention that two of them were topless?
More brilliant features to follow, including Hot New Bands For 2008 and My Favourite Breaks In Music. There probably won't be any more badly done Photoshop jobs.
12 comments:
Dude,
whilst your blog provides a jaded insight into contemporary music scenes, I find it blinding to read.
Literally, blinding. The colour/typeface combinations makes my eyes go a bit hazy.
If you're re-doing the blog, please please, consider going Swiss
(excellent e.g. http://www.upstartblogger.com/)
p.s. I meant "...good & jaded insight..."
FLAT PACK HEROES
you are so so wrong about them, their lyrics and what you seem to beleive their lack of punk and social understanding. i've seen these lads loads and they are great at what they do. i think maybe you're trying to pigeon hole them as punk and it isnt working because they arent solid, unadulterated punk. They have elements of different styles of music and they dont pretend to be one particular type.
as for the lyrics which you claim are so socially unsound: did you not listen? proud to be young is one a really good example of their great lyric writing, that song (and most of their others) pretty much sums up how modern life is changing, for better or worse. "we're the myspace generation, we've forgotten how to interact/you cant start a conversation without someone thinking you're a twat"- one of the best two lines of a song i have ever heard. it truely reflects todays breakdown of communication, despite internet/myspace etc which are indeed designed to help communication. she's a skank (a song which you actually criticised) is also a favourite of mine, maybe you should spend more time actually listening to the lyrics rather than thinking up hideously inaccurate reviews.
flat pack heroes live shows are some of the best i've seen from local bands. jamie's natural enthusiasm and charisma fits perfectly with the songs they play, the lyrics he sings and the atmosphere of how a local gig should be. i first saw them in a small function room at the back of a pub in leominster and absoluetly fell in love with their attitude and the vibes that they send out.
i think you're wrong..
i'm interested to hear what you say back though so it'd be quite nice if you'd leave a comment back to me.
Beti.
PS. to be perfectly honest this is a disgusting idea, what is the point in just slating bands that you dont personaly like? you arent even doing it in a constructive way, you are basically bitching. and do you know how i found out about this review? one of teh lads from fph found it and it has really bothered them, he is a great mate of mine (met through my love of their music so i am not actually biased) and you have actually manages to knock their confidence in themselves. what gives you the right to do that? to set up a blog desinged just to whinge about bands that you dont like is pathetic.
so it seems that you personally do not like this band. however, i know of many people, including myself that love them.
you mention that your band did a gig with them and that they had a banner made from and old union jack with the labels written on it and them doing a cover of an arctic monkeys song. sorry, but what the hell has this got to do with anything you're moaning about?? so what if they did. they probably made the song better than what it was orginally.
you also made yourself look stupid with that comment, as you depict them to be "bad punk" when they aren't actually wholey punk and they don't try to be.
you also got their supposed "bad" lyric writing wrong too. "made an attempt" at social realism?? no, if you listen properly you'll find that in a lot of their songs, they will show how today's modern society is changing.
and how can you say that they are one of the worst bands you've ever seen? they all play well. they always get people dancing/jumping about and frontman, jamie, is one of the best frontmen i've ever seen. and i'm not just talking about local bands, i mean EVER. he has great stage presence and can really lighten up a room.
a piece of advise for you:
if you're going to slag off a band, do it through constructive criticism, not just bitching like a school girl in a playground.
boob
beti, i shall be honest, i completely forgot about this post. as you can see i've not really blogged recently.
regardless of my inactivity, i should probably defend my writing. so here goes:
"i think maybe you're trying to pigeon hole them as punk and it isnt working because they arent solid, unadulterated punk. They have elements of different styles of music and they dont pretend to be one particular type."
you know i listened to them again and you're right, they're not completely punk. they're still bad though.
""we're the myspace generation, we've forgotten how to interact/you cant start a conversation without someone thinking you're a twat"- one of the best two lines of a song i have ever heard. it truely reflects todays breakdown of communication, despite internet/myspace etc which are indeed designed to help communication."
beti, i don't see how that charming couplet reflects the breakdown of communication in today's society. what you seem to be saying is that if someone is on myspace then they'll be considered a "twat" if they begin to talk to you. is this right? because it doens't make a whole lot of sense.
"she's a skank (a song which you actually criticised) is also a favourite of mine, maybe you should spend more time actually listening to the lyrics rather than thinking up hideously inaccurate reviews."
i listened to this one again, to check i got the lyrics right. i admit that i was wrong. it appears to be "she's a skank/but i bet you've ragged her". lovely stuff.
"flat pack heroes live shows are some of the best i've seen from local bands. jamie's natural enthusiasm and charisma fits perfectly with the songs they play, the lyrics he sings and the atmosphere of how a local gig should be."
that's great. when i saw them they were terrbile. but you've probably worked that out by now.
"i think you're wrong.."
this is what i believe to be the crux of the argument. you think i'm wrong. i think i'm right. do you see what this is? it's a difference of opinions. opinions are subjective.
"to be perfectly honest this is a disgusting idea, what is the point in just slating bands that you dont personaly like?you arent even doing it in a constructive way, you are basically bitching."
because it amuses me. i would say that i was fairly constructive. i went into some detail as to why i didn't like them. i didn't just straight out say they sucked.
" one of teh lads from fph found it and it has really bothered them, he is a great mate of mine (met through my love of their music so i am not actually biased) and you have actually manages to knock their confidence in themselves. what gives you the right to do that? to set up a blog desinged just to whinge about bands that you dont like is pathetic."
this surprises me - your friend has decided to perform songs he's written in the public domain and in doing so he has presented himself for public scrutitny; surely he can't expect everyone to like his band? did he not consider that people might not like what he's written? if he wants to make it in a band (which i'm guessing he does) he should get a thicker skin. not everyone is going to like his band. i'm only one person.
also, i didn't set up a blog to make fun of bands. i set it up to keep track of every gig i go to, which you should know, as it says so at the beginning of this post. and why shouldn't i blog about bands i don't like?
boob, here is your reply.
"you mention that your band did a gig with them and that they had a banner made from and old union jack with the labels written on it and them doing a cover of an arctic monkeys song. sorry, but what the hell has this got to do with anything you're moaning about?? so what if they did. they probably made the song better than what it was originally."
you know why this is relevant? because it's THE SAME BAND. that's the point.
"you also made yourself look stupid with that comment, as you depict them to be "bad punk" when they aren't actually wholey punk and they don't try to be."
i didn't say they were bad punk. i said they are best described as bad punk. i could say they're a combination of a lot of bad stuff if you like.
"and how can you say that they are one of the worst bands you've ever seen? they all play well. they always get people dancing/jumping about and frontman, jamie, is one of the best frontmen i've ever seen. and i'm not just talking about local bands, i mean EVER. he has great stage presence and can really lighten up a room."
you know how i can say they're one of the worst bands i've ever seen? because it's my opinion. and i think different things to you. playing well has nothing to do with being good. the red hot chili peppers play incredibly well but they're still awful. both of the times i saw them, they managed to get the grand total of no one dancing. kudos on that.
"if you're going to slag off a band, do it through constructive criticism, not just bitching like a school girl in a playground."
as i said before, i thought my criticism was pretty constructive. but we shall have to agree to disagree.
can i ask you to name your top 5 bands? because i think all this is is you not liking the gritty "shes a skank/ but i bet you've ragged her" type of pop/powerpop/punk/etc etc etc music that fph are. you are vey closed minded about them.
also wanted to ask why the fact that two of them were topless is mentioned and relevant. that is what jamie and welshie do, and why shouldnt they? they are both attractive men and if they want to then why not?!
the gig you saw them play was with NYPC and foals wasnt it? hardly their scene is it? it was a good gig but the wrong audiance, i think. electro-scene kids and fph dont really mix. so you know..
and my mate in the band who found this didnt mind teh fact taht someone didnt like them, he isnt stupid, he knows that. but much like i said, its NOT dont constructivly. you may have gone into detail but that is NOT how you know that its constructive criticism.
you were harsh with thsi band, unnecessarily harsh.
but i am interested in my first question so please reply to this.
beti
My name is Deano I'm from Swinton hear r my top 5 bandz:
1. flat pack heroes
2.flat pack heroes
3. flat pack heroes
4. flat pack heroes
5. flat pack heros
"can i ask you to name your top 5 bands? because i think all this is is you not liking the gritty "shes a skank/ but i bet you've ragged her" type of pop/powerpop/punk/etc etc etc music that fph are. you are vey closed minded about them."
yes you can. at the moment my top 5 favourite bands are probably radiohead, les savy fav, pissed jeans, spy versus spy and black flag. obviously it changes all the as i'm sure your list does.
"also wanted to ask why the fact that two of them were topless is mentioned and relevant. that is what jamie and welshie do, and why shouldnt they? they are both attractive men and if they want to then why not?!"
it is relevant because my review was based on the set i saw them play, and they played topless. whilst i'm aware that stage lights are very hot, plug as a venue is pretty cold. shirtless sets are pretty much a no no.
"the gig you saw them play was with NYPC and foals wasnt it? hardly their scene is it? it was a good gig but the wrong audiance, i think. electro-scene kids and fph dont really mix. so you know.."
this partly irrelevant. a good band
is a good band regardless of whether they suit the bill.
"and my mate in the band who found this didnt mind teh fact taht someone didnt like them, he isnt stupid, he knows that. but much like i said, its NOT dont constructivly. you may have gone into detail but that is NOT how you know that its constructive criticism."
could you explain to me how i could be more constructive in my criticism?
"you were harsh with thsi band, unnecessarily harsh."
no i wasn't.
deano,
start listening to more bands.
okay, okay. so yeah different opinions on different things blah blah blah.
but i still think that you shouldn't just go slagging off bands that you don't like without giving decent reasons for your hatred. that does not include "two of them were topless" that is completely irrelevant.
boob
topless gigs are a no-no eh dave? mm? see you tuesday.
Post a Comment